Farooque Suleman Mansuri v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
VPH IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP. 3625-16
VPH
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION No. 3625 OF 2016
Farooque Suleman Mansuri … Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra … Respondent
Mr. Satyaram Gaud, for the Petitioner.
Mr. K. V. Saste, APP for the Respondent.
CORAM : V. M. KANADE, & Ms. NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, JJ. DATE : NOVEMBER 25, 2016 PC.
. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to pursue the complaint before the Magistrate. Writ petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed, and is accordingly disposed of.
[Ms. NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, J.] [V. M. KANADE, J.]
Vinayak Halemath
1 / 1
Farooque Suleman Mansuri
The State of Maharashtra
V. M. KANADE
NUTAN D. SARDESSAI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court