Petitioner withdrew the criminal writ petition to pursue an alternate legal remedy; court disposed of the petition as withdrawn with liberty to withdraw.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
WP198-16.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.
Criminal Writ Petition No.198/2016 (Santosh Bhimrrao Napte .vs. State of Maharashtra through P.S.O. P.S. Dhanaj, Washim and another. )
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's orders
Mr. O.Y. Kashid, Advocate for Petitioner. Mr. M.J. Khan, APP for respondents.
CORAM : B.R. Gavai & V.M. Deshpande, JJ. DATED : July 04,2016.
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty to withdraw the petition so as to take recourse to the alternate remedy available in law. Writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
JUDGE
JUDGE
halwai
Santosh Bhimrrao Napte
State of Maharashtra through P.S.O. P.S. Dhanaj, Washim and another
B.R. Gavai
V.M. Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
