The Bombay High Court Nagpur Bench allowed Criminal Application No.366/2016, condoning the delay. It also admitted a subsequent appeal, calling for the record, with the public prosecutor waiving notice.
Application allowed with delay condoned; Appeal admitted with call for record issued.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
APPA366-16.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.
Criminal Application (APPA) No.366/2016 (Manik s/o Chirkut Uikey .vs. The State of Maharashtra, PSO Saoner, Nagpur. )
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's orders
Mr. L.B. Thawkar, Advocate for Applicant. Mrs. M.N. Hiwase, APP for Respondent.
CORAM : B.R. Gavai & V.M. Deshpande, JJ. DATED : July 04,2016.
For the reasons stated, the application is allowed. Delay is condoned.
Criminal Appeal No._____/2016 .
The appeal is taken up for admission.
Admit . Call for R. & P. Mrs. M.N. Hiwase, learned APP waives notice.
JUDGE JUDGE
halwai
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the criminal application is maintainable and delay is condonable.
Whether the appeal should be admitted and the call for record should be made.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
APP No.366/2016Referred¶4
Manik s/o Chirkut Uikey
The State of Maharashtra
B.R. Gavai
V.M. Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
