Respondent sought to dispose of a writ petition filed by an ice factory claiming interest. The Court declined to exercise extraordinary jurisdiction for new claims as previous grievances were met, dismissing the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp196412.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.1964 OF 2012
Famous Ice Factory, Jalgaon
Petitioner
Versus
Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd., Jalgaon and others
Respondents
Mr.Sanket S. Kulkarni, advocate for the petitioner. Mr.S.M.Godsay, advocate for Respondents.
CORAM : R.M.BORDE &
A.I.S.CHEEMA, JJ. DATE : 05th January, 2016
PER COURT:
So far as relief claimed by the petitioner in terms of prayer clauses “B”, “C” and “D” are concerned, those have already been met and as such, no grievance survives in respect of those prayers.
Petitioner has also claimed interest at the rate of 12% p.a. on the amount, which according to it, is liable to be recovered from the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd., (MSEDCL).
Considering peculiar facts and circumstances of the matter and considering the fact that most of the grievances raised by the petitioner, in this petition, have been satisfied, it would not be appropriate to grant further indulgence in exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution.
Writ Petition stands disposed of.
A.I.S.CHEEMA
JUDGE
R.M.BORDE JUDGE
adb/wp196412
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Famous Ice Factory, Jalgaon
Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd., Jalgaon
R.M.Borde
A.I.S.Cheema
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
