The High Court Bench disposed of a five-letter patent appeal, finding it devoid of substance and lacking merit, rendering no interference necessary.
No; the appeal stands disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
SHANKARRAO BALAJI DANGAT DIED THRU LRS SMT PARVATIBAISHANKARRAO DANGAT AND ORS VERSUS RANGNATH BALAJI DANGAT AND ORS
Advocate for Appellants : Mr. Brahme Shailesh P. Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. Bedre Vinayak Sudhakar
CORAM : R. M. BORDE & A. I. S. CHEEMA, JJ. Date: January 04, 2016
PER COURT :-
3 Pending Civil Applications, if any do not survive and stand disposed of.
( A. I. S. CHEEMA, J. ) ( R. M. BORDE, J. )
vbd
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the five-letter patent appeal required any merit-based interference.
SHANKARRAO BALAJI DANGAT DIED THRU LRS SMT PARVATIBAISHANKARRAO DANGAT AND ORS
RANGNATH BALAJI DANGAT AND ORS
R. M. BORDE
A. I. S. CHEEMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
