Court disposed of two filed writ petitions after petitioners failed to appear for almost 12 years. Registry ordered file reconstruction for a misplaced petition.
Petitions disposed of; Rule discharged; File of WP No. 409 of 2004 to be reconstructed within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
wp-1722.04
pmw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (PIL) NO.1722 OF 2004
| Aziz Ahmedali Merchant Versus |
… Petitioner |
|---|---|
| Maharashtra Housing and Area | |
| Development Authority and Ors. | … Respondents |
WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2815 OF 2004
| Mr. Nadir Khan Mohammed Khan | … Petitioner |
|---|---|
| Versus | |
| The State of Maharashtra and Ors. | … Respondents |
None for the Petitioners. Mr. G.W. Mattos, AGP for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE : 14th OCTOBER, 2016
P.C.
. When these Petitions were called out yesterday, none appeared for the Petitioners. Perhaps with the long passage of time of 12 years, the Petitioners may not be interested in prosecuting the Petition. Accordingly, we dispose of the Petitions. Rule is discharged. In the event the Petitioners apply for restoration, they will have to satisfy
the Court that cause of action for filing these Petitions still survives. File
1 of 2
2 wp-1722.04
of Writ Petition No.409 of 2004 has been misplaced. Registry to take steps for reconstruction of the file within four weeks from today. After the file is reconstructed, the said Petition shall be listed before appropriate Bench.
(A.A. SAYED, J )
(A.S. OKA, J )
2 of 2
Aziz Ahmedali Merchant
Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority
Mr. Nadir Khan Mohammed Khan
The State of Maharashtra
A. S. Oka
A. A. Sayed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
