Coram adjudicated three writ petitions where petitioners were permitted to withdraw suits, resulting in disposal of each cause of action.
Petitioners allowed to withdraw; all writ petitions disposed of as withdrawn. Ad-interim orders vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
903-905-WPLG-373.2016.doc
suresh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION {L} NO.373 OF 2016
M/s. Marshal Corporation & Anr. .... Petitioners Vs. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Ors. .... Respondents
AND
WRIT PETITION {L} NO.375 OF 2016
M/s. Swastik Realtors & Anr. .... Petitioners Vs. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Ors. .... Respondents
AND
WRIT PETITION {L} NO.385 OF 2016
Siddhivinayak Enterprises & Anr. .... Petitioners Vs. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Ors. .... Respondents
Mr. Ameya Deosthale i/by M/s. Hariani & Co. for the Petitioners in all petitions.
Mr. H.C. Pimple for Respondent Nos.1 to 4 in all petitions.
Ms Geeta Shastri, Addl.GP, with Mr. Amit Shastri, AGP, for Respondent Nos.5 & 6 in WPL-373 & 375 of 2016.
Mr. Milind More, Addl.GP, for Respondent Nos.5 & 6 in WPL-385/2016.
Page 1 of 2
903-905-WPLG-373.2016.doc
suresh
CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, JJ.
DATE : AUGUST 02, 2016
P.C:
the petitioners are allowed to withdraw the writ petitions. They are all disposed of as withdrawn.
(DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Page 2 of 2
M/s. Marshal Corporation & Anr.
M/swastik Realtors & Anr.
Siddhivinayak Enterprises & Anr.
Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI
SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
