The High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging a condition requiring deposit of Rs.1 lakh to stay an appeal before a Tribunal. The bench held that the amount was not unfair or excessive.
Writ petition dismissed; amount to be deposited by 6-8-2016, else appeal stands dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
10-WP-1050.2016.doc
suresh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1050 OF 2016
Poonawalla Financials Pvt. Ltd. .... Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. .... Respondents
Mr. Devvrat Singh i/by M/s. Lawfin & Associates for the Petitioner.
Mr. V.A. Sonpal, Special Counsel with Mr. B.B. Sharma, AGP, for the Respondents.
CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, JJ.
DATE : AUGUST 02, 2016
P.C:
the amount being too meagre, we do not think that the condition imposed is either unfair or arbitrary or excessive, rendering the right of appeal illusory. There is no merit in the writ petition. It is dismissed.
10-WP-1050.2016.doc
suresh
dismissed. No extension of time will be granted.
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with a condition of stay of deposit of a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- imposed in an appeal before the Tribunal.
Poonawalla Financials Pvt. Ltd.
State of Maharashtra
Anr
SC DHARMADHIKARI
DR SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
