Petitioners sought permission to withdraw a writ petition. The court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the petition on that basis without expressing an opinion on available remedies.
Permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to take out appropriate remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
WRIT PETITION NO. 1850 OF 2016
KEDARNATH BHAUSAHEB DANDE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Bhosale Sanjaykumar B. AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. S.D. Kaldate
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE & P.R. BORA, JJ. Dated: February 16, 2016
PER COURT :-
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the Petition with liberty to take out appropriate remedy.
( P.R. BORA, J. )
( S.S. SHINDE, J. )
sga/-
Kedarnath Bhusaheb Dande
The State of Maharashtra
S.S. Shinde
P.R. Bora
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
