Balaji Maroti Kamble v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal writ petition allowed because petitioner was released on parole during pendency of Petition; no Legal propositions as order is procedural.
Criminal writ petition allowed because petitioner was released on parole during pendency of Petition; no Legal propositions as order is procedural.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
criwp185.16.doc
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 185 OF 2016
Balaji s/o Maruti Kamble .. PETITIONER
VERSUS State of Maharashtra & another .. RESPONDENTS
Mr. R.A. Jaiswal, advocate for petitioner. Mr. Y.S. Mahajan, APP for the State.
CORAM : R.M. BORDE & K. L. WADANE, JJ. DATE : 29th MARCH, 2016.
PER COURT :
shall be paid Rs. 3,000/- towards his professional charges.
dyb
Balaji s/o Maruti Kamble
State of Maharashtra
another
R.M. Borde
K. L. Wadane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court