This order rejects a writ petition filed by a prison petitioner challenging the rejection of his application for furlough extension. The court held that overstaying the granted furlough period disentitled him to further extension, finding the impugned order proper and reasonable. No interference under Article 226 was warranted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
criwp183.16.doc
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 183 OF 2016
Kamru @ Javed Hanif Lalakhan .. PETITIONER
VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & others .. RESPONDENTS
Mr. A.D. Ostwal, amicus curiae (appointed) for petitioner. Mr. K.S. Patil, APP for the State.
=====
CORAM : R.M. BORDE & K. L. WADANE, JJ. DATE : 29th MARCH, 2016.
OPERATIVE ORDER :
criwp183.16.doc
2
permissible under the prison rules.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Deputy Inspector General of Jail was justified in rejecting the petitioner's application for extension of furlough due to overstaying.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kamru @ Javed Hanif Lalakhan
The State of Maharashtra
R.M. BORDE
K. L. WADANE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
