Criminal Writ Petition regarding petition for parole due to wife's illness. Petitioner alleged non-decision by authority, but Court found he had been granted parole, rendering petition infructuous.
Rule discharged as the petition has become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RMA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1798 OF 2016
Laxman @ Bhimgonda Aayappa Patil
.. Petitioner
Versus
Divisional Commissioner & Ors.
.. Respondents
Appearances
Mrs. Sonia Miskin Advocate (appointed) for the Petitioner Mrs. A.S. Pai APP for the State
CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI &
MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.
DATE : JUNE 24, 2016.
ORAL ORDER [PER SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.] :
ground of illness of his wife. It was stated that the wife of
the petitioner was suffering from some spinal problem. The
grievance of the petitioner is that though the application for
jfoanz vkacsjdj 1 of 2
parole was preferred on 7.7.2015, the same was not decided by the concerned Authority.
application of the petitioner has been decided and the petitioner was granted parole and even as of today, the petitioner is on parole. In this view of the matter, this
petition has become infructuous, hence, Rule is discharged.
[ MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J ] [ SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. ]
jfoanz vkacsjdj 2 of 2
Laxman @ Bhimgonda Aayappa Patil
Divisional Commissioner & Ors.
V.K. Tahilramani
Mridula Bhartkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
