Writ petition disposed of with direction to respondents to decide on petitioner's representation for allotment of tenement under Indira Awas Yojana within six months.
Direction to respondents 2, 3 to decide on petitioner's representation within six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp1790.16.doc
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 1790 OF 2016
Vajinath Rambhau Motarkar .. PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & others .. RESPONDENTS
Mr. S.S. Kulkarni, advocate for petitioner. Mr. K.D. Mundhe, AGP for the State. Mr. P.D. Suryawanshi, advocate for respondent no. 4.
=====
CORAM : R.M. BORDE & SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ. DATE : 19th DECEMBER, 2016.
PER COURT :
Petitioner has already tendered representation to the Collector on 04.12.2015 for redressal of his grievance in respect of allotment of tenament under Indira Awas Yojana. It also appears that the Collector has called report from the Project Director on 11.12.2015 however, no decision appears to have been taken thereafter.
( SANGITRAO S. PATIL ) ( R. M. BORDE ) JUDGE JUDGE dyb
Vajinath Rambhau Motarkar
The State of Maharashtra
Respondent No. 4
Respondent No. 2
Respondent No. 3
R.M. Borde
Sangitrao S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
