This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 3-CA2680.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2680 OF 2016
IN WP/5738/2012
SANJAY MAHADEO MANE
VERSUS
REGIONAL MANAGER, M.S.F.C., AURANGABAD
AND OTHERS
Mr.S.S.Gangakhedkar, Advocate for applicant
Mr.P.S.Patil, Advocate for respondent no.1
Mr.S.R.Deshpande, Advocate for respondent no.1 in
Writ Petition
Mr.S.S.Chapalgaonkar, Advocate for respondent no.6
in Writ Petition
Mr.Mr.S.V.Adwant, Advocate for respondent nos.2 to 4
in Writ Petition
Mr.P.P. More, Advocate for proposed-respondent.
CORAM : R.M. BORDE AND
SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.
DATE : DECEMBER 16, 2016
PER COURT :
Heard.
2.The Civil Application allowed in terms of
prayer clause (B). Mr.P.P.More, learned Counsel
appears for the proposed respondent.
2 3-CA2680.odt
3.Put up Writ Petition for admission on
13.01.2017.
[SANGITRAO S. PATIL, J.] [R.M. BORDE, J.]
kbp
Sanjay Mahadeo Mane
Regional Manager, M.S.F.C., Aurangabad
R.M. Borde
Sangitrao S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court