Petitioners sought quashing of an FIR. The petition was dismissed for default due to non-appearance and non-prosecution, noting that petitioner Nos.1 and 3 were absconding.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
crwp174
1
ssp
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.174 OF 2014
Office Notes, Office
Memorandam of Coram,
appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders
or directions and
Registrar’s orders
None for the Petitioners
Ms M.H.Mhatre, APP for the Respondent No.1.
CORAM :A.S.OKA AND
A.A.SAYED,JJ.
DATE : AUGUST 26, 2016
P.C.
1None appears for the petitioners.
The prayer in this petition is for
quashing the First Information Report
which is at Exh.A to the petition.
Today, report is submitted by the
learned APP which is taken on record
and marked `X-1' for identification.
The report records that the petitioner
Nos.1 and 3 are absconding.
2None appears for the petitioners.
Hence, we dismiss the petition for non
prosecution.
(A.A.SAYED,J)(A.S.OKA,J.)
Petitioner Nos.1 and 3
Respondent No.1
A.S.Oka
A.A.Sayed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court