Petitioner sought writ relief against rejection of furlough application. Rejection was upheld due to prior parole violation and 1115 days overstay. Petitioner's appeal against rejection was dismissed. High Court discharged the rule.
Rule discharged against the petitioner; furlough application rejection upheld.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
4 wp 172-15.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 172 of 2015
Ronald James Alvares .. Petitioner
v/s.
The State of Maharashtra . ..Respondents
Mrs. Nasreen S.K.Ayubi, Advocate appointed for the Petitioner. Mr.A.S.Shitole, APP for the Respondent/State.
CORAM : SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI &
SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ. DATED : APRIL 04, 2016.
P.C.
application came to be rejected. The appeal preferred against the said order of rejection also came to be dismissed. Hence this petition.
1 of 2
salgaonkar
4 wp 172-15.doc
and brought back to the prison. There was overstay on the part of the petitioner of 1115 days. It is mainly on this ground that the application for furlough came to be rejected.
(ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.) (SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.)
2 of 2
salgaonkar
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the rejection of the petitioner's furlough application due to prior overstay on parole
Whether the High Court is justified in refusing furlough on account of previous absconding and overstay of 1115 days
Whether the impugned order rejecting the furlough application is arbitrary or illegal
Ronald James Alvares
The State of Maharashtra
V.K.Tahilramani
Anuja Prabhudesai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
