In this writ petition, the High Court of Bombay granted the petitioners leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to file appropriate proceedings before dismissing the petition accordingly.
Liberty to take out appropriate proceedings for withdrawal of the Petition was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
8.wpl-250.16.doc
Sbw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (L)NO.250 OF 2016
Mr. Umidali S. Jairazbhoy & Ors. ..Petitioners
Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors.
..Respondents
Ms. Poornima Bhatia a/w Nirupama Kar i/b. Interjuris for the Petitioners. Mr. Anurag Gokhale, AGP, for the Respondent no.1. Mr. H. C. Pimple for Respondent nos.2 to 5.
CORAM: M. S. SANKLECHA &
A. K. MENON, JJ.
DATE : 23RD JUNE, 2016
P.C.:
petitioners seek leave to withdraw this Petition with liberty to take out appropriate proceedings. Liberty as prayed for, granted.
(A. K. MENON, J.) (M. S. SANKLECHA, J.)
wadhwa
Mr. Umidali S. Jairazbhoy & Ors.
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
M. S. SANKLECHA
A. K. MENON
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
