Corporate respondent agreed to hear petitioner considering his senior citizen status, obtain representation order, and suspend attachment in case of adverse decision within specified timelines.
Petition treated as representation dispute resolution initiated on compassionate ground petition dismissed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
901.wp-1467.16.doc
Sbw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1467 OF 2016
Ganpati Manjunath Kanchugar ..Petitioner Versus Brihanmumbai Mahanagarpalika & Ors. ..Respondents
..Respondents
Mr. Shamrao B. Gore for the Petitioner. Mr. H. C. Pimple for the Respondent no.1.
CORAM: M. S. SANKLECHA & A. K. MENON, JJ.
DATE : 23RD JUNE, 2016
P.C.:
2 901.wp-1467.16.doc
accordance with law. Mr. Pimple further states that the process of hearing the Petitioner and taking a decision in accordance with law would be completed within a period of four weeks from today. It is also stated that in case the dispute is not resolved in favour of the petitioner, the Respondent-Corporation will not act upon the orders of attachment dated 26h February, 2016 for a period of further three weeks of its communicating the decision.
wadhwa
Ganpati Manjunath Kanchugar
Brihanmumbai Mahanagarpalika
M. S. SANKLECHA
A. K. MENON
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
