This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
suresh
903-WPL-1268.2016.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION {L} NO.1268 OF 2016
Iqbal S/o Ghulam Dastagir Ansari .... Petitioner Vs. The Reliance Energy & Anr. .... Respondents
Mr. Gauraj Shah i/by Mr. A.N. D'Silva for the Petitioner. Mr. Satish Kamat for the Respondents.
CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, JJ.
DATE : JUNE 30, 2016
P.C:
The petitioner's Advocate has filed additional
affidavit pointing out that after the writ petition was filed, the respondent No.1-Company has granted new electric connection to the petitioner. Once the petitioner's grievance is redressed, in the light of this affidavit which we take on record, the writ petition is disposed of as nothing survives therein.
(DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Iqbal S/o Ghulam Dastagir Ansari
The Reliance Energy
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI
SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
