The petitioner sought leave to withdraw a writ petition against the Chief Executive Officer with liberty to approach the High Power Committee. The court granted the withdrawal.
Liberty to approach the High Power Committee.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
902-WP-1451.2016.doc
suresh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1451 OF 2016
Anilkumar Pranlal Dave .... Petitioner Vs. The Chief Executive Officer & Ors. .... Respondents
Ms Jyoti Chavan for the Petitioner. Mr. Girish D. Utangale with Mr. Vinay Bhorge i/by M/s. Utangale & Co. for the Respondent Nos.1, 4 & 7. Mr. H.S. Venegaonkar, Addl.GP, for the Respondent No.8.
CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, JJ.
DATE : JUNE 30, 2016
P.C:
After this matter was argued and when we expressed our disinclination to interfere in writ jurisdiction, the learned Advocate for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach the High Power Committee. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for.
(DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Anilkumar Pranlal Dave
The Chief Executive Officer & Ors.
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI
DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
