Disposed

1 Dadasabeb S/O Nana Shinde v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Bombay HC19 Dec 2016WP/1545/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a criminal writ petition filed by a petitioner seeking investigation into a missing woman. The Court found that officers had made efforts, including publishing photographs, and directed the Superintendent of Police to continue the search. The petition was disposed of without further directions as the petitioner offered no new suggestions.

What the court decided

AI extract

1 Dadasabeb S/O Nana Shinde Vs the State of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

1545.14WP

¶2

¶3

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶5

¶6

______________________________________________________ CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1545 OF 2014

¶7

 DADASABEB S/O NANA SHINDE
VERSUS

¶8

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

¶9

...

¶10

Advocate for petitioner : Mr. ِ N.P. Bangar APP for Respondent/State:Mr.D.R. Kale Advocate for respondent nos.3&4:Mr.R.V. Gore

¶11

...

¶12

CORAM: S.S.SHINDE & K.K.SONAWANE, JJ.
 Dated: December 19, 2016

¶13

Heard the learned counsel appearing
for the petitioner, the learned A.P.P.
appearing for the Respondent/State and
the learned counsel appearing for
respondent nos.3 and 4.

¶14

2.We have carefully perused the reply
filed by respondent no.1. It appears that
since the year 2014, the concerned
Officers have made efforts for redressal
of the grievance of the petitioner. Even
earlier two affidavits have been filed by
the concerned Police Officer. It appears

¶15

1545.14WP

¶16

¶17

that inquiry of relatives and in-laws is
done and also the record from the State
CID, Pune is checked. The photographs of
the missing woman is published in local
news papers, local news channels and
Doordarshan.

¶18

3.When this Petition was taken up for
hearing on 28th November, 2016 at the
request of the learned counsel appearing
for the petitioner hearing of this
Petition was deferred till 9th December,
2016 so as to enable the petitioner to
give input/clues/suggestions for further
investigation. Again on 9th December,
2016, the hearing of this Petition was
deferred granting further opportunity to
thepetitionertogive
input/clues/suggestionsforfurther

¶19

investigation. The learned counsel
appearing for the petitioner, on
instructions, submits that there are no
further suggestions. However, he submits
that the concerned Investigating Officer
to continue his investigation/search in
future and as and when the petitioner
gets any new information or suggestion or
input, he will approach the Investigating
Officer. In case, the petitioner
approaches the Investigating Officer in

¶20

1545.14WP

¶21

¶22

future for giving clues/suggestions, as
the case may be, the concerned
Investigating Officer may take into
consideration his clues/suggestions, if
any in future.

¶23

4.We are satisfied with the efforts
taken by the Respondent Officers. On
couple of occasions we directed the
Superintendent of Police to look into the
matterandmonitorthefurther

¶24

investigation/search by the concerned
Police Officer. Pursuant to the said
directions, the Superintendent of Police
has also taken sincere efforts and filed
the affidavits. Be that as it may, as
assured the Superintendent of Police in
his affidavit filed before this Court has
stated that the search/investigation will
continue in future. We dispose of this
Writ Petition, however, we make it clear
that in case, the petitioner in future
gives some suggestions or any new clue or
input, the concerned Officer may cause
investigation and may search on the basis
of such suggestions/clues if any.

¶25

(K.K.SONAWANE, J)

¶26

sga/

1 Dadasabeb S/O Nana Shinde v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

1 Dadasabeb S/O Nana Shinde v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajendrasingh S/O Jogindarsingh Nambardar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Motiram S/O Tulshiram Nikam Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Gajanan S/O Ramchandra Kadam and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Keshav S/O Tuljaram Salampure and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Sharad S/O Vitthalrao Munde Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bharat S/O Vishnu Pandhare Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others