The writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as no appearance was filed on behalf of the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 WP 1531.2000.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.1531 OF 2000
[Sushil Kumar s/o Shankarlal Gandhi .vs. Municipal Commissioner, Nagpur and one]
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND
V.M. DESHPANDE, JJ.
DATED : AUGUST 25, 2016.
None for the petitioner. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
JUDGE JUDGE
Gulande
2 WP 1531.2000.odt
C E R T I F I C A T E
“I certify that this order uploaded is a true and correct copy of original signed order.”
Uploaded by : A.S. Gulande, P.A.
Uploaded on : 29.08.2016
Sushil Kumar
Municipal Commissioner, Nagpur
B.R. Gavai
V.M. Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
