Partly allowed

Shri Shankarrao S/O Bhagwanji Vyawahare and 2 Others v. State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary Dept. of Industries, Energy and Power and 3 Others

Bombay HC1 Aug 2016WP/1501/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order partly allowed a writ petition seeking benefits under the 5th and 6th Wage Revisions. It directed Respondent No. 4 to submit an appropriate proposal to Respondent No. 1 within six weeks for processing.

What did the court decide?

Direction to submit fresh proposal within six weeks; direction to process proposal within next four months.

Shri Shankarrao S/O Bhagwanji Vyawahare and 2… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2016)

Order

0108wp1501.15

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO. 1501/2015.

¶6

Shri Shankarrao Bhagwanji Vyawahare and others. - VERSUS-

¶7

State of Maharashtra and others.

¶8

Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.

¶9

CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & KUM. INDIRA JAIN, JJ.

¶10

DATE : AUGUST 01, 2016.

¶11

Heard Shri N.B. Bargat, learned Counsel

¶12

for the petitioners, Shri N.S. Rao, learned A.G.P. for respondent nos. 1 to 3 and Shri D.M. Kakani, learned Counsel for respondent no.4.

¶13

Orders of this Court dated 07.03.2016 contained a direction to respondent no.4 to forward necessary proposal within a period of four weeks. As the proposal was already sent, respondent no.4 has not forwarded any fresh proposal. Petitioners also have not made any grievance about it, though a period of more than four months had already expired.

Order

0108wp1501.15

During hearing we find that prayer of

¶18

petitioners is to direct respondent nos. 1 to 3 to consider the proposal already sent by respondent no.4 and to approve it so that petitioners can be given benefit of 5th and 6th Wage Revision.

¶19

In this situation, we direct respondent no.4 to submit appropriate proposal once again to respondent no.1 within a period of six weeks from today without fail.

¶20

The respondent no.1 shall after receipt of such proposal, process it as per law within next four months. If necessary an opportunity of hearing may be extended to the parties. With these directions and keeping all rival contentions open, we partly allow and dispose of the Writ petition. No costs.

JUDGE JUDGE

Rgd.

Order

0108wp1501.15

CERTIFICATE

I certify that this judgment/order uploaded is a true and correct copy of original signed judgment/order.

¶28

Uploaded by : R.G. Dhuriya. Uploaded on : 01.08.2016 Pvt. Sec.

Shri Shankarrao S/O Bhagwanji Vyawahare and 2 Others v. State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary Dept. of Industries, Energy and Power and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shri Shankarrao S/O Bhagwanji Vyawahare and 2 Others v. State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary Dept. of Industries, Energy and Power and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dilip S/O. Vitthalrao Bondre, Yavatmal Vs the Project Officer, Integrated Tribal Devlopment Project, Pandharkawda, Yavatmal and Others

Gangasagar Matsyapalan Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit, Bhiwapur through Its Sect. Yashwant S/O T. Bambol Vs Shri Badalshah N. Madavi

Smt. Lilawati Kisandas Anand and Others Vs Municipal Council, Hinghanghat, through Its Chief Officer

Gram Sudharak Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Ghota Thr. President, Shri Madhukarrao N. Mendhe and Anothe Vs Mrs. Ashwini Bhide, the Secty. State of Maharashtra, School Education and Sports Dept. and 2 Others

Sau. Rima Ravi Vaidya Vs the Collector, Bhandara and Others

M/S Shushma Products, M.I.D.C. Nagpur, Thr. Its Director and Another Vs Vaishali Ramteke, Manager Bank of India Thr. Branch Manager, Nagpur and 2 Others