The Single Judge Court disposed of a contempt petition filed by the auction purchaser denying applications for modification of earlier orders for dismissal of the contempt application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Order
0108cp111.16
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
C.P.NO. 111/2016 IN W.P.NO. 2545/2015.
M/s. Shushma Products MIDC, Nagpur and another. - VERSUS-
Vaishali Ramteke, Branch Manager, BOI Nagpur and others.
Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & KUM. INDIRA JAIN, JJ.
DATE : AUGUST 01, 2016.
Heard R.H. Agrawal, learned Counsel for
the petitioners, Shri R. Kamble, learned Counsel for respondent no.2 and Shri S.A. Chaudhari, learned Counsel for respondent no.3.
Order
0108cp111.16
2
as also for deletion of respondent no.1. We accept the reason given by the learned counsel for the petitioner for his inability to carry out the amendment. We extend the said time by one week.
Rgd.
JUDGE JUDGE
Order
0108cp111.16
3
CERTIFICATE
I certify that this judgment/order uploaded is a true and correct copy of original signed judgment/order.
Uploaded by : R.G. Dhuriya. Uploaded on : 01.08.2016 Pvt. Sec.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the non-appearance of respondent no.2 before DRAT Madras warrants contempt of court.
Whether the Impugned Order depriving petitioner of possession warrants exercise of contempt jurisdiction.
M/s. Shushma Products MIDC
Vaishali Ramteke
B.P. DHARMADHIKARI
KUM. INDIRA JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
