The petitioner, a former lecturer sought relief in a writ petition. Counsel argued the petition became infructuous as she left the job and the interim order mandated continued employment and wage payment, rendering recovery of amounts impossible by the respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
6-wp-1367-2002
WRIT PETITION NO.1367 OF 2002 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.161 OF 2003
Anjali N. Joshi
...Petitioner
vs.
The Registrar, SNDT College of Arts and SCB and Others
...Respondents
Mr. Mihir Desai, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr. V. Koprikar, for the Petitioner
Mr. A. Shaikh i/b. Rui Rodrigues, for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
CORAM : SHANTANU KEMKAR & MAKARAND KARNIK, JJ.
DATE : OCTOBER 03, 2016
P.C.:
Petitioner has now left the job and is working in some other institute.
In the circumstances according to the learned senior counsel appearing for the Petitioner, this Petition may be disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. He further submits that in terms of the
interim order passed on 21st June, 2002 which was continued form
time to time, the Respondent was directed to continue the Petitioner
1/2
Vishal Parekar
6-wp-1367-2002
as full time lecturer and to pay her wages regularly. He submits that
in terms of the said order, the Petitioner was continued and was paid her wages as she was working for the post of full time lecturer and therefore the Respondent may not recover the said amount from the Petitioner after dismissal of this Petition.
Respondent as full time lecturer, it is not open for the Respondent to recover the amount from the Petitioner.
infructuous. Accordingly, the Notice of Motion also stands disposed of. Rule is discharged.
(MAKARAND KARNIK, J.) (SHANTANU KEMKAR, J.)
2/2
Vishal Parekar
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a Technical Education Rehabilitation Authority order to displace a teacher after the High Court directed continuation should be recovered as arrears by the college after the petitioner changed
Anjali N. Joshi
The Registrar, SNDT College of Arts
SCB
Shantanu Kemkar
Makarand Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
