The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad disposed of a writ petition as infructuous on the ground that the issues raised had become of academic importance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
28 WRIT PETITION NO. 1393 OF 2012 WITH CA/9617/2013 IN WP/1393/2012
KHUSHAL MURLIDHAR JOSHI AND ANR VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Kulkarni Mukul S. AGP for Respondents: Mr. B.V. Virdhe Advocate for respondent No.3: Mr. S.T. Shelke Advocate for Respondent No.5 : Mr. Wani Girish V.
CORAM : R. M. BORDE & A. I. S. CHEEMA, JJ. Date: January 11, 2016
PER COURT :-
1 By passage of time petition is rendered infructuous. The issues raised in the matter are rendered of academic importance and those can be taken up for consideration as and when the cause of action accrues.
2 Keeping open the objections raised in the petition for being considered at an appropriate stage, writ petition stands disposed of.
( A. I. S. CHEEMA, J. ) ( R. M. BORDE, J. )
vbd
Khushal Murlidhar Joshi
The State of Maharashtra
R. M. Borda
A. I. S. Cheema
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
