This court dismisses a civil application as it has been rendered infructuous by the passage of time, noting no substantive reasoning.
The civil application was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ca4063.12
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4063 OF 2012 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.5992 OF 2011
(The State of Maharashtra & ors. vs. Abhinandan Ganeshrao Kapure &
anr. )
OfficeNotes, Court’s or Judge’s Orders
Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances,
Court’s orders or
directionsand
Registrar’s orders.
Mr.S.B. Pulkundwar, A.G.P. for Applicants.
Mr.N.R. Jamdhade Advocate for Resp. No.1.
....
CORAM: R.M. BORDE AND
A.I.S. CHEEMA, JJ.
DATE : 8TH JANUARY, 2016
ORDER:
. By passage of time the Application has been
rendered infructuous. Hence the Civil Application
stands dismissed, accordingly.
[A.I.S. CHEEMA, J.] [R.M. BORDE, J.]
asb/JAN16
The State of Maharashtra & ors.
Abhinandan Ganeshrao Kapure & anr.
R.M. Borde
A.I.S. Cheema
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court