This is a one-liner order where the High Court of Bombay at Bombay, on the application of learned counsel, granted leave to withdraw the writ petition and dismissed it as withdrawn.
Leave to withdraw the petition granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP.39/2015(901)
1
mnm
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.39 OF 2015
Padmabhushan Vasantdada Patil Prathishthan ...Petitioner Vs. All India Council for Technical Education & Ors. ...Respondents
Mr. P.J. Thorat, Advocate for the Petitioner Mrs. Meena H. Doshi a/w. Ms. Priyanka Sawant Advocates for Respondent No.1 Mr. Milind More, AGP for the State
CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR &
M.S. KARNIK, JJ. DATED :1ST OCTOBER, 2016
P.C. :
Learned Counsel for the Petitioner on instructions seeks
leave to withdraw the Petition. The prayer is accepted. The
Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(M.S. KARNIK, J.) (SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.)
Padmabhushan Vasantdada Patil Prathishthan
All India Council for Technical Education
Shantanu S. Kemkar
M.S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
