Partly allowed

Vinayak Vijaysingh Chauhan v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Bombay HC19 Sept 2016WP/1355/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition concerns the transfer of police investigation. The High Court directed the Director General of Police to create a grievance redress mechanism. It also directed the concerned Deputy Commissioner to examine the petitioner's representations on police investigations within three weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directed DGP to create a grievance redress mechanism; directed Deputy Commissioner to examine representations and decide within three weeks.

Vinayak Vijaysingh Chauhan Vs the State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

¶2

1/3

¶3

11 cri wp 1355.16 as.doc

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶5

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1355 OF 2016

¶6

Vinayak Vijaysingh Chauhan ….. Petitioner V/s The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ….. Respondents

¶7

Mr. M.K. Kocharekar i/b Mr. Ganesh Bhujbal for the Petitioner. Mr. K.V. Saste, APP for the Respondents/State.

¶8

CORAM : A.S. OKA &

¶9

A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATED : 19 SEPTEMBER 2016

¶10

ORDER:

¶11

1 This is one of the several Writ Petitions filed in this Court by first Informant/victim of the alleged offences seeking the transfer of investigation. Our attention is invited to Circular dated 5 July 2012 which in turn refers to Circular dated 22 June 2012. The said Circular dated 5 July 2012 has been issued by the Special Inspector General of Police (L&O) on behalf of the Director General of Police, Maharashtra State. The said Circular seeks to create a machinery for going into the grievances of the victims of the offences/first informants as regards investigation carried out by the Police Officers.

1/3

2/3

11 cri wp 1355.16 as.doc

¶16

2 Considering the fact that the grievances are being made by large number of victims/first informants as regards defective investigation or lack of proper investigation, it will be appropriate if the Director General of Police creates a grievance redress mechanism by notifying the officers who have been authorized to look into the grievances as regards investigation and even to take a decision regarding transfer of investigation. If such grievance redress mechanism is provided by the police, a forum will be available to the victims and the first informants to put forward their grievances regarding the investigation. We direct the Director of General of Police to issue a fresh Circular notifying the creation of grievance redress mechanism. As soon as such grievance redress mechanism is created, the details of such mechanism shall be displayed in each police station in the State so that first Informants/victims are made aware of availability of said mechanism.

¶17

3 In the present case, the Petitioner who is the first Informant made a detailed representation to the Joint Commissioner of Police (Crime), Mumbai on 18 February 2016, a copy of which is annexed to the Petition. Thereafter, he made one more representation on 19 May 2016 to the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Dahisar (East) and Assistant Commissioner of Police, Dindoshi Region, Malad (East), Mumbai. A copy of the said representation is also placed on record.

2/3

3/3

11 cri wp 1355.16 as.doc

¶22

4 We direct the concerned Deputy Commissioner who is having jurisdiction over Dindoshi Police Station to look into both the representations made by the Petitioner. Before taking any decision on the basis of said representations, the Deputy Commissioner shall call for the files of the investigation. After examining the files and considering the representations, the Deputy Commissioner shall take appropriate decision within a period of three weeks from today.

¶23

5 We dispose of the Petition in terms of the above directions. For compliance with the direction issued to the Director General of Police as well as for reporting compliance with the direction issued to the Deputy Commissioner of Police, the Petition shall be listed on 10 October 2016 under the caption of “directions”.

¶24

katkam

¶25

3/3

Vinayak Vijaysingh Chauhan v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vinayak Vijaysingh Chauhan v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shri. Narayan Kalu Kedari and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Janardan Bhujangrao Garje Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Dr. Balasaheb Eknath Harpale and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Kusum N. Harsora Vs the State of Maharashtra

Ashish Hari Singh Dongra and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Arjun Malji Vaijal Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.