Shivaji @ Bhau Eknath Jadhav v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
381 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
What did the court decide?
The appeal is added to the final hearing board in the week commencing 18.4.2016.
381 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
The appeal is added to the final hearing board in the week commencing 18.4.2016.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
8_appa 381
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.381 OF 2016 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.222 OF 2015
Shivaji @ Bhau Eknath Jadhav Versus
...Applicant
The State of Maharashtra
...Respondent
Mr. Rahul S. Kate for the Applicant. Mrs. A.S. Pai, A.P.P. for the Respondent -State.
CORAM: SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI &
SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ
DATED: 29th March, 2016
P.C.:-
The learned Advocate for the Applicant brought to our notice the order dated 2nd March 2015 passed by this Court in Criminal Appeal No.222 of 2015 wherein it was directed that the hearing of the appeal is expedited and when the paper books are received the the appeal is to be added to the final hearing board. The learned counsel for the Applicant submitted that despite the order dated 2nd March, 2015 though the paper books are ready the appeal has not been added to the final hearing board. He further submitted that the Applicant is about 64/65 years of age and he is suffering from almost 50% disability as he is suffering from
Megha
1/2
8_appa 381
paralysis.
(SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI,J.) (SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI,J.)
Megha
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the pending criminal appeal should be added to the final hearing board.
Shivaji @ Bhau Eknath Jadhav
The State of Maharashtra
V.K. Tahilramani
Anuja Prabhu Jessai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court