The High Court of Judicature at Bombay disposed of Writ Petition No. 1250 of 2016 on the basis of consent terms filed by the petitioner and respondents.
Petition disposed of in terms of consent terms.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Urmila Ingale
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1250 OF 2016
Shrikant Yadav Pakhle .. Petitioner Vs. The University of Mumbai and ors. .. Respondents
Mr.Suresh Kumar J.Panicker i/b M/s.Panicker & Associates, for the Petitioner.
Mr.Arvind G.Kothari, for Respondents No. 2 & 3.
CORAM : SHANTANU.S.KEMKAR &
M.S.KARNIK, JJ. DATE : 23rd SEPTEMBER, 2016
P.C. :
. Parties through their Counsel.
consent terms dated 23/09/2016. The consent terms have been
signed by them. The petitioner and respondents No.2 & 3 are also present in-person.
dispose of this Petition in terms of consent terms dated 23/09/2016. Consent terms dated 23/09/2016 are taken on
1/2
record and marked 'X' for identification. The consent terms
shall form part of the order.
( M.S.KARNIK, J.)
(SHANTANU.S.KEMKAR, J.)
2/2
Shrikant Yadav Pakhle
The University of Mumbai and ors.
SHANTANU.S.KEMKAR
M.S.KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
