The High Court at Bombay informed that the impugned notice was already implemented and the petitioner's structure demolished. Holding the writ petition infructuous due to efflux of time, the court disposed of it without examination of merits.
Petition disposed of as infructuous; right reserved to approach appropriate forum.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WPL. 379-16
VPH
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (L) No. 379 OF 2016
Akbar Khan & Ors. … Petitioners Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. … Respondents
Mr. Pritesh K. Bohade, for the Petitioners.
Ms. Shobha Ajit Kumar, for the Respondent - BMC.
*** CORAM : V. M. KANADE, & M. S. KARNIK, JJ. DATE : APRIL 25, 2016
PC.
. We are informed that the impugned notice has already been implemented and structure of the Petitioners has been demolished. Petition has, therefore, become infructuous by efflux of time. Reserving the right of the Petitioners to take out an appropriate proceeding before an appropriate forum, writ petition is disposed of.
Vinayak Halemath
1 / 1
Akbar Khan & Ors.
State of Maharashtra
V. M. Kanade
M. S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
