This court disposed of a contempt petition wherein the learned counsel for the Corporation stated there was substantial compliance with the previous court order. Consequently, the contempt petition was dismissed and the show-cause notice was discharged.
Contempt petition is disposed of. Show cause notice is discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
923.conpw 6.16.doc
Urmila Ingale
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 6 OF 2016 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 3086 OF 2014
Ali Mohmamed Joosab Retiwalla and others .. Petitioners
Vs.
Mr.Rushikesh Sarpotdar and another .. Contemnors (Org. Respondents)
None for the Petitioners.
Mr.S.S.Pakle a/w Ms.Geeta Joglekar, for BMC. Ms.Sharmila Deshmukh, for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : V. M. KANADE & M.S.KARNIK, JJ. DATE : 22nd APRIL, 2016
P.C. :
. Learned Counsel for the Corporation states that there is substantial compliance of the order passed by this Court. The respondent – Corporation filed their reply. We are satisfied that there is substantial compliance of the order passed by this Court. Hence, Contempt Petition is disposed of. Show cause notice issued is discharged.
( M.S.KARNIK, J.) (V. M. KANADE, J.)
1/1
Ali Mohmamed Joosab Retiwalla and others
Mr. Rushikesh Sarpotdar and another
V. M. KANADE
M.S. KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
