Yudhisthir Khatau and Anr. v. Sicom Limited
Case brief
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
What the court decided
904-WP.1192.2016.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1192 OF 2016
Yudhisthir Khatau and Anr. } Petitioners versus Sicom Limited } Respondent
Mr. Kunal Mehta with Mr. Naishadh Bhatia i/b. M/s. Crawford Bayley and Co. for the peitioners.
Mr. Arnav Mohanty i/b. M/s. Wadia Ghandy and Co. for the respondent.
CORAM :- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, JJ. DATED :- August 3, 2016
P.C. :-
The petitioners' advocate has been instructed to seek leave to withdraw the writ petition. In terms of the instructions received, the writ petition is allowed to be withdrawn and stands disposed of as such. No costs. Ad-interim order, if any, stands vacated forthwith.
(DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Page 1 of 1
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Yudhisthir Khatau and Anr.
- respondent
Sicom Limited
Coram
S. C. Dharmadhikari
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court