In three connected criminal writ petitions seeking release on parole or furlough, the court discharged the rule made initial as all three petitions became infructuous upon notification that the petitioner had already been released from prison after completing his sentence.
Rule discharged; all three petitions declared infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sherla V.
wp.912.2016+_9.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.912 OF 2016
Mangesh Suresh Bhise ... Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent
WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1177 OF 2016
Mangesh Suresh Bhise ... Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent
WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1189 OF 2016
Mangesh Suresh Bhise ... Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent
Mrs.Nasreen S.K. Ayubi, Advocate appointed for the Petitioner Mr.H.J. Dedia, APP, for Respondent – State
CORAM: SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI & MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.
DATE: JULY 18, 2016
ORAL ORDER (PER SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.):
1 / 2
wp.912.2016+_9.doc
Superintendent of Nashik Road Central Prison. The said letter is taken on record and marked 'X' for identification. The letter states that the petitioner has completed his period of imprisonment and he has been released from the prison.
(MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) (V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.)
2 / 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitions for release on parole/furlough are maintainable given the petitioner has already been released from prison.
Mangesh Suresh Bhise
The State of Maharashtra
V.K. Tahilramani
Mridul Bhatkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
