Disposed

Chandrakalabai Ratilal Chorbele and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC24 Nov 2016WP/11646/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This brief order disposes of two writ petitions by relying on the reasons assigned in a companion petition (WP No.3596 of 2016). The court accepted a bank's undertaking to repay small depositors within twelve weeks and large depositors in five installments within ten months, thereby quashing the present petitions without detailed analysis.

What the court decided

AI extract

Chandrakalabai Ratilal Chorbele and Others Vs the State… — Banking and Recovery | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

1 19-wp11622 and 11646.odt

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶3

 WRIT PETITION NO. 11622 OF 2016

¶4

ANKUSH BHAGAJI PATHARE AND OTHERS
VERSUS

¶5

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶6

AND

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO. 11646 OF 2016

¶8

CHANDRAKALABAI RATILAL CHORBELE AND OTHERS

¶9

VERSUS

¶10

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶11

Mr.D.R.Jayabhar, Advocate for petitioners

¶12

Mr.A.S.Shinde and Mr.S.B.Pulkundwar, AGP for
respondent nos.1 and 2 in respective petition

¶13

CORAM : R.M. BORDE AND

¶14

SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.
DATE : NOVEMBER 24, 2016

¶15

PER COURT :

¶16

Heard.

¶17

2.The issue raised in the instant petitions

¶18

is already addressed in Writ Petition No.3596 of

¶19

2016 and other companion petitions decided on
19.07.2016, which order has been modified on
21.07.2016.

¶20

2 19-wp11622 and 11646.odt

¶21

3.In view of the reasons assigned by this
Court while deciding Writ Petition No.3596 of 2016
and other companion petitions vide orders dated
19.07.2016 and 21.07.2016, the present Writ
Petition Nos.11622 of 2016 and 11646 of 2016 stand
disposed of. For ready reference, the relevant
paragraph in order dated 21.07.2016 is reproduced
as under :-

¶22

"6] Learned counsel for respondent bank
states on instructions that the small
depositors having deposited amount upto
Rs.1,00,000/- and claiming withdrawal,
would be repaid deposit amount within
twelve weeks from today. It is further
informed that large depositors having
maintained deposits above Rs.1,00,000/-
would be paid deposit amount in five
equal installments within a period of 10
months from today. The statement made by
learned counsel for respondent bank is
accepted. The bank shall ensure refund of
deposit amount as undertaken. In view of
above, all the writ petitions stand
disposed of."

¶23

[SANGITRAO S. PATIL, J.]

¶24

kbp

Chandrakalabai Ratilal Chorbele and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Chandrakalabai Ratilal Chorbele and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jagannath Jaywanta Gadekar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Rajendra Shivram Mannade Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Amol Arunrao Sugandhi and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Rameshwar Bhaskar Dandale Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Harika Balaji Chintawar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Bhaidas Haraji Rathod Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others