Single Judge Bench dismissed the writ petition holding that the petitioner has an adequate alternative remedy available under section 29(3) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act for redressal of grievances. The petition was disposed of without granting relief.
Petition disposed of; no relief granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
909 WRIT PETITION NO. 10915 OF 2016
RAJENDRA SHIVRAM MANNADE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. V.R. Jain (kamboj) AGP for Respondents:Mr. S.B. Joshi
... CORAM : R. M. BORDE & SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ. Date: November 23, 2016
PER COURT :-
1 In view of availability of alternate remedy for redressal of the grievances of the petitioner under section 29(3) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, the instant petition does not deserve consideration.
2 Keeping option of the petitioner to avail of remedies available under law open, the writ petition is disposed of.
( SANGITRAO S. PATIL, J. ) ( R. M. BORDE, J. )
vbd
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition deserves consideration given the availability of alternate remedy under section 29(3) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
RAJENDRA SHIVRAM MANNADE
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
OTHERS
R. M. BORDE
SANGITRAO S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
