Petitioner sought leave to withdraw the writ petition. The court granted leave and allowed the withdrawal and disposal of the petition.
Leave granted to withdraw; withdrawal accepted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1.WP1123_2014
vidya
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1123 OF 2014
Asghar Yusuf Mukaddam
... Petitioner
vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
... Respondents
Mr. Farhana Shah, Advocate for the petitioner. Mrs. A.S. Pai, APP for the respondent/State.
CORAM: MRS. V.K. TAHILRAMANI & MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.
JULY 14, 2016.
P.C.
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this
Petition.
(MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR,J.) (MRS. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.)
1 of 1
Asghar Yusuf Mukaddam
The State of Maharashtra
V.K. Tahilramani
Mridula Bhathkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
