Shailesh Chimanlal Bhatt v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought parole to attend nephew's marriage. Court held the marriage period had passed, rendering prayer infructuous. Rule discharged.
Petitioner sought parole to attend nephew's marriage. Court held the marriage period had passed, rendering prayer infructuous. Rule discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
12b. cri wp 1115-15.doc
RMA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1115 OF 2015
Shailesh Chimanlal Bhatt
.. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
.. Respondent
| Appearances | |
|---|---|
| Ms. Rohini Dandekar | Advocate (appointed) for the Applicant |
| Mrs. A.S. Pai | APP for the State |
CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI &
MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.
DATE : JUNE 20, 2016.
ORAL ORDER [PER SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.] :
be released on parole so that he can attend his nephew's
marriage and the ceremonies related thereto which are to
take place from 19.4.2015 to 23.4.2015.
jfoanz vkacsjdj 1 of 2
12b. cri wp 1115-15.doc
ceremonies had to take place is already passed, hence, this
petition becomes infructuous, hence, rule is discharged.
[ MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J ] [ SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. ]
2 of 2
jfoanz vkacsjdj
Shailesh Chimanlal Bhatt
The State of Maharashtra
V.K. Tahilramani
Mridula Bhatkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court