The Court disposed of an old writ petition regarding a threatened notice publication by a bank, noting the challenge no longer survives after eight years and directing no relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
15-WP.1110.2013.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1110 OF 2013
Jagdish Jagjivandas Doshi } and Ors. } Petitioners versus State Bank of India and Ors. } Respondents
Mr. Rohan Cama with Ms. Sapna Rachure i/b. M/s. T. N. Tripathi and Co. for the Petitioner.
None for the Respondents.
CORAM :- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & M. S. SONAK, JJ.
DATED :- FEBRUARY 12, 2016
P.C. :-
Heard Mr. Cama appearing for the Respondents. We
do not think that the larger controversy raised for consideration
should be examined in the peculiar facts of this Petition. The Petitioner is moving this Court on an apprehension that a notice will be published in the newspapers as threatened by the communication dated 17th April, 2013, copy of which is at page 59 of the paper book.
Page 1 of 2
J.V.Salunke,PA
15-WP.1110.2013.doc
Petitioners, then, we do not see how in the year 2016 this challenge survives. In the event the Petitioners have any apprehension of the bank repeating this act, they are at liberty to move for appropriate reliefs in appropriate proceedings.
disposed of.
(M.S.SONAK, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Page 2 of 2
J.V.Salunke,PA
Jagdish Jagjivandas Doshi and Ors.
State Bank of India and Ors.
S. C. Dharmadhikari
M. S. Sonak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
