Disposed
Sakharam Bhivaji Athavale v. the State of Maharashtra and Another
Bombay HCWP/10923/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
32 WRIT PETITION NO. 10923 OF 2016
SAKHARAM BHIVAJI ATHAVALE VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
... Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. K.C. Sant AGP for Respondents:Mr. K.D. Mundhe
... CORAM : R. M. BORDE & SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ. Dated: November 15, 2016
PER COURT :-
1 Counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, stats that, the representation/appeal tendered by the petitioner is decided by the Board of Directors and as such the grievance raised by the petitioner in the instant petition does not survive.
( SANGITRAO S. PATIL, J. ) ( R. M. BORDE, J. )
vbd
SAKHARAM BHIVAJI ATHAVALE
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
R. M. BORDE
SANGITRAO S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court