The High Court in a writ petition held that the condition imposed by the Tribunal is just, fair, and reasonable, and the discretionary power was exercised in consonance with materials produced. Consequently, the court declined to interfere and dismissed the petition.
The Writ Petition is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Dixit
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1072 OF 2016
Optech Engg. Pvt. Ltd., Thane. .… Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. …. Respondents
Mr. Ratan Samalo for the Petitioner.
Ms. Naira Jejeebhoy, Special Counsel, a/w. Ms. Gauri Rao, A.G.P., for Respondent Nos.1, 3, 4 and 5.
CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI &
DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.J.
DATE : 14TH JUNE, 2016.
P.C. :
1/2
WP-1072-16.doc
[DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.] [S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.]
2/2
WP-1072-16.doc
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to interfere with the discretionary order of the Tribunal imposing a condition.
Whether the condition imposed is just, fair, and reasonable.
Optech Engg. Pvt. Ltd.
The State of Maharashtra
Dharmadhikari
Phansalkar-Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
