Short order condoning delay in filing a notice of motion by the applicant in an appeal against lump sum order. Application allowed without costs.
Notice of motion allowed without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2-NMA.445.2016.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 445 OF 2016 IN
CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL (L) NO. 25 OF 2016
M/s. Osho International Foundation } Applicant versus The Commissioner of Central } Excise, Pune – III } Respondent
Mr. Mihir Naniwadekar i/b. Mr. Ajay Kumar for the applicant.
Mr. Pradeep S. Jetly with Mr. Jitendra B. Mishra for the respondent.
CORAM :- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, JJ. DATED :- JUNE 13, 2016
P.C. :-
Having heard both sides and perusing the affidavit in
support of the notice of motion, we find that there is sufficient cause made out for condoning the delay. The notice of motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). No costs.
(DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Page 1 of 1
J.V.Salunke,PA
M/s. Osho International Foundation
The Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune – III
S. C. DHARMADHIKARI
DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
