Writ petition withdrawn by the instructions of the petitioner. Both the writ petition and chamber summons were disposed of as withdrawn, vacating any interim orders.
Leave to withdraw Writ Petition granted; Writ Petition and Chamber Summons disposed of as withdrawn; ad-interim and interim orders vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
14-WP.1053.2013.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1053 OF 2013 WITH CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 280 OF 2015
Smt. Pratima Pundlik Nayak } Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors.} Respondents
Mr. Kailas Dewal for the Petitioner.
Mr. Dipen Furia i/b. M/s. Shah and Furia Associates for Respondent No. 3.
CORAM :- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & M. S. SONAK, JJ.
DATED :- FEBRUARY 12, 2016
P.C. :-
In terms of the written instructions received, copy of
which is taken on record and marked as 'X' for identification, leave to withdraw the Writ Petition is granted. The Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn. The Chamber Summons does not survive in the light of the disposal of the Writ Petition and stands disposed of as such. Ad-interim and interim order, if any, to stand vacated forthwith.
(M.S.SONAK, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Page 1 of 1
J.V.Salunke,PA
Smt. Pratima Pundlik Nayak
The State of Maharashtra
S. C. Dharmadhikari
M. S. Sonak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
