The writ petition was declared infructuous due to the efflux of time and was disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
22.8WP.1038.16
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 1038 OF 2016. (M/s. Sanjay Construction Industries .vs. The State of Maharashtra & others)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Mr. H.R. Gadhia, Advocate for petitioner.
Mr. K.R. Lule, A.G.P. for respondent nos. 1 to 3.
CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & V.M. DESHPANDE, JJ.
DATED : AUGUST 22, 2016.
With the efflux of time, the petition is rendered infructuous.
The petition is disposed of as such.
Judge Judge J.
22.8WP.1038.16
2
C E R T I F I C A T E
“I certify that this Order uploaded is a true and correct copy of original signed Order”.
Uploaded by : Ki. Jeswani, Uploaded on : 23.8.2016.
M/s. Sanjay Construction Industries
The State of Maharashtra
B.R. GAVAI
V.M. DESHPANDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
