Three separate contempt petitions were heard. The court held that the respondents had complied with the impugned orders. Consequently, no further proceedings were considered necessary, and the petitions were disposed of without detailed reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
22.08.cp.37.16
1
IN THE COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CONTEMPT PETITION NO.37/2016 in W.P.NO. 1 78/2014 (D)
(Shri Prakash Laxman Rathod and others vs. Shri Ujwal Uke and Others )
&
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.38/2016 IN W.P. NO. 178/2014
(Shri Manohar Vithoba Sardar and others vs. Shri Ujwal Uke and Others )
&
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 40/2016 IN W.P.NO. 1350/2014
(Shri Tukaram s/o Shriram Suradkar and another vs. Shri Ujwal Uke and Others )
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders
Shri R.N.Ghuge, Advocate for the petitioners
CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & V.M. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATED : 22nd August, 2016
Shri R.N.Ghuge, the learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the respondents have already complied with the order, of which the contempt is alleged.
As such, we do not find it necessary to proceed further in the matters.
Contempt Petitions are disposed of.
JUDGEJUDGE
sahare
Shri Prakash Laxman Rathod and others
Shri Ujwal Uke and Others
Shri Manohar Vithoba Sardar and others
Shri Ujwal Uke and Others
Shri Tukaram s/o Shriram Suradkar and another
Shri Ujwal Uke and Others
B.R. Gavai
V.M. Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court