The High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing the Education Officer to take a decision on the petitioner's proposal for teacher appointment within eight weeks.
Direction to respondent No. 2 to take decision on appointment proposal within eight weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 WP-10364-16
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 10364 OF 2016
Janjagruti Secondary and Higher Secondary School Shevga, Ta. Ambad and another
...PETITIONERS
versus
The State of Maharashtra and another
...RESPONDENTS
Mr. Vivek V. Dhage, Advocate for petitioners Mr. K.N. Lokhande, AGP for respondents.
CORAM : R.M. BORDE AND K.K. SONAWANE, JJ.
DATED : 20th OCTOBER, 2016.
Order :-
Sd/Sd/-
MTK
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition is maintainable to direct an Education Officer to take a decision on a proposal for appointment of a teacher expeditiously?
Janjagruti Secondary and Higher Secondary School Shevga and another
The State of Maharashtra
another
R.M. BORDE
K.K. SONAWANE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
