The High Court of Judicature at Bombay disposed of a review petition in a writ case, finding no apparent error on the record and holding that no ground for review existed, rejecting the application.
Review petition rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
rpwst28963
1
ssp
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
REVIEW PETITION ST.NO.28963 OF 2015
WRIT PETITION NO.96 OF 2007
Office Notes, Office
Memorandam of Coram,
appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders
or directions and
Registrar’s orders
Mr.Girish S. Shukla the petitioner in person
None for the Respondent.
CORAM : A.S.OKA, &
P.D.NAIK,JJ.
DATE : MAY 5, 2016
P.C.
1Heard the learned counsel for the
petitioner. There is no error apparent
on the face of the record. Even
otherwise there is no ground for
review. Review petition is rejected.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the review petition raises any ground for interference.
Petitioner
Respondent
A.S.OKA
P.D.NAIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court