Bombay High Court allowed Civil Application No.69 of 2016, hearing the applicant in person and condoning delay.
Civil Application allowed; delay condoned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cao69
1
ssp
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.69 OF 2016 IN
REVIEW PETITION ST.NO.28963 OF 2015
WRIT PETITION NO.96 OF 2007
Office Notes, Office
Memorandam of Coram,
appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders
or directions and
Registrar’s orders
Mr.Girish S. Shukla the Applicant in person
None for the Respondent.
CORAM : A.S.OKA, &
P.D.NAIK,JJ.
DATE : MAY 5, 2016
P.C.
1Heard the learned counsel for the
applicant. Delay is condoned. The
Civil Application is allowed.
(P.D.NAIK,J.)(A.S.OKA,J.)
Unspecified Applicant
Unspecified Respondent
A.S.Oka
P.D.Naik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court