This is a review petition against an order passed in a Notice of Motion within a writ petition. The court held there was no error apparent on the face of the record and thus rejected the review petition.
The review petition was rejected with no error apparent on the face of the record.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
osrevn53
1
ssp
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
REVIEW PETITION (L)NO.53 OF 2016
Office Notes, Office
Memorandam of Coram,
appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders
or directions and
Registrar’s orders
Mr.Ashish Mehta a/w Ms Shivani Deshmukh i/b Ashish
Mehta for the petitioner
Mr.Susmit Phatala for the respondent Nos.1 and 2
Mr.P.G.Lad for respondent No.3
Mr.Parag Shah and Ms Seema Navale i/b Shah & Co.
for the Respondent Nos. 5 to 15 and 17 to 20.
CORAM : A.S.OKA, &
SMT.ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI,JJ.
DATE : NOVEMBER 28, 2016.
P.C.:
1The review is sought of the order
dated 5th October 2015 passed in the
Notice of Motion for interim relief
taken out in the writ petition. The
Notice of Motion has been disposed of
by accepting the statement in the
affidavit which is referred in the
paragraph 3 of the said order. Clause
4 of the order grants liberty to the
reviewpetitionertotakeout
appropriate proceedings.
2Hence, there is no error apparent
on the face of the record. Even
2 osrevn53
otherwise, there is no ground for
review. Review petition is rejected.
(ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI,J.)(A.S.OKA,J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether there is any error apparent on the face of the record or any ground for review in the impugned order.
Petitioner
Respondent Nos. 1 and 2
Respondent No. 3
Respondent Nos. 5 to 15 and 17 to 20
A.S. OKA
Anuja Prabhu Dessai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court